Media Action Center is a group of of concerned residents throughout the U.S. led by former Emmy-winning broadcaster turned media reformer Sue Wilson. We have successfully influenced policy at the Federal Communications Commission and at local TV and Radio stations throughout the country for more than a decade to ensure We the People are truly served by the publicly owned airwaves. (See the archive of our work under "older posts.") We successfully forced Entercom to give up its $13.5 million license to KDND for killing a woman in a radio water drinking stunt. We have a long-running action to label Alex Jones' radio show as the fiction it is, which has taken Jones' program off dozens of radio stations nationwide. We educated the Supreme Court in FCC v Prometheus Radio on critical information to #SaveLocalNews.

Please see MAC's 2018 Comment to the FCC (below) to learn why these actions are crucial to Democracy. Find full journalistic coverage of the Supreme Court case and our Amicus brief, Sinclair Broadcasting's shell game, Alex Jones, the Strange v Entercom trial and other public interest media issues at SueWilsonReports.com. For background on how we arrived in this era of disinformation and what to do about it, see Wilson's 2009 documentary Broadcast Blues.

COMMENT TO FCC TO DISALLOW ONE BROADCASTER FROM REACHING 80% OF NAT'L TV VIEWERS

August 22, 2025

BROADCAST MEDIA OWNERSHIP 

Most people hearing those three little words yawn. They don’t know that big broadcast companies like Sinclair and Nexstar own TV stations. They just know what shows they enjoy, where they find their favorite sports, and who they trust for local news and weather. But most people don’t fully understand that legally, We the People own the airwaves and broadcasters must obtain licenses to broadcast locally over our air. As condition of being awarded one of those rare licenses is the requirement that those broadcasting into local communities must serve the “public interest, convenience and necessity.” This is not just theory; this is embedded in Communications Law dating back to the dawn of broadcast technology and most recently updated in 1996. 

...the FCC appears poised to ignore the Law and take matters into its own hands to allow all or most of our local TV stations to be operated by one or two players regularly sanctioned by the FCC itself, Nexstar or Sinclair Broadcasting. (Nexstar and Tegna have already announced their merger deal;  Sinclair has signaled it intends to make a yet higher offer to Tegna shareholders. )  According to the Poynter Institute, 
     “If it does go through, the Nexstar-Tegna merger would create a broadcasting giant. The combined company would own 265 stations in 44 states and the District of Columbia, with a footprint in 132 of the country’s 210 designated market areas, the standard unit Nielsen uses to measure TV audiences. That includes nine of the top 10 markets, 41 of the top 50, 62 of the top 75 and 82 of the top 100.But the number that matters most is that Nexstar’s reach would grow to 80% of U.S. television households — more than double the FCC’s current 39% cap.” 

FULL DOCUMENT FILED at the FCC HERE:  

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/108222107909908 



FCC Plan Could Turn YOUR Local TV News into Propaganda - PLEASE Act Now!

 August 14, 2025

 

    The Media Action Center is partnering with the Media and Democracy Coalition to make a pivotal Comment to the Federal Communications Commission. Within days, the FCC is likely to change local News on TV into radio-style propaganda.

   Will you please help?  Watch and ACT!

https://youtube.com/shorts/nbavsjzjYRA?si=wjD_SHao9V6lY2pc 

FTC Request for Public Comments Regarding Technology Platform Censorship

May 21, 2025

 In the Matter of:

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Request for Public Comments Regarding Technology Platform Censorship

Docket number FTC-2025-0023

Good FTC Commissioners,

Am I being shadow banned on the social media platform X? Maybe. Let’s examine the evidence.

First, I am not a social media influencer. I currently have 2,069 followers on X, roughly the same as I had on Twitter for years. While it was Twitter, I enjoyed many exchanges with others, and often had my posts retweeted. I mainly post about issues of media policy and disinformation, and my point of view differs from that of current X owner Elon Musk. But having lived through fire evacuations, I also post an evacuation checklist whenever a major fire breaks out. Those posts gained the most traction.

Since Twitter became X, the personal exchanges went away, and I get very few retweets, even when asking whether people can see my posts. Is it shadowbanning? Perhaps it’s just their new algorithm. How would I know? I only know that the eyeballs on my evacuation checklist posts used to be high but have dwindled down to very few.

Please see my posts from July 2022 compared to similar posts I have been making in recent days:

JULY 2022:

MAY 2025:


 

As the Commissioners can see, the number of public views on these similar posts changed dramatically after Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter. Does that mean X is shadow banning my posts?

I can just say I see posts from many people on X complaining about just that.

 

Thank you for taking up this critically important issue.

 

Sincerely,

 

Sue Wilson

Media Action Center